somehow I cannot comment my post, so I write our classmate's opinions here.
toward president's perspective>>
some of my classmates agreed the idea that our common sense is needed to avoid false accusation and thinks this system works good to think about crimes seriously. However, others said it's difficult for general people to take part in a court without enough knowledge about law. I like a suggestion that having a law doctor to get proffessional knowledge.
towards anti lay judge system group's member>>
All my classmates complained about the no helpful support for lay judge diagnosed as PTSD and surprised the rule we may have to pay money if people regect being lay judge without clear reason. They said that's not fair if a person be lay judge unwillingly.
A student suggested that to limit the cases that lay judge deal with to avoid the problem of PTSD comes from the trials of violent crimes.
1 件のコメント:
Thanks for summarizing the feedback given by your classmates. It shows that they understood what you were talking about and were able to express their own opinions about it.
I was glad to see that you gave some of your own opinions about their feedback. For example, you wrote "I like the suggestion that having a law doctor to get professional knowledge." I don't quite understand this suggestion though. Does it mean that a doctor of law should teach the lay judges about the fine points of law so that they can make their decisions more competently?
コメントを投稿