evaluation of websites

I introduce this web site. FACTS AND DETAILS

The author is not an expert, and his mission is not described clearly. he doesn't belong to some organization, but we can contact him because there is an e-mail address so that we can question the author.
The information written here is carried from some news papers, magazines and other sources, so the facts are correct, maybe. Why I cannot be sure for that is that even though he listed the specific names he used in 'about this project page', he doesn't list some useful links or the page he used, so we cannot get information from another websites and confirm it is true.

I think this is hard to see since  he just describes the facts and it has no picture,  little color, and too long sentences. He should brief more and highlight some sentences that he thinks important so that we can understand what he wants to tell.

This website is not so bad, because it has relatively a lot of information, brief profile of the author, and updated recently, but I think it should be changed like the way I suggested above.